We interrupt this dog blog for a rant about rhetoric and civil discourse.
Here is why I plan never to call anyone a “hater” or refer to them as such.
History: Haters Gonna Hate
It’s a good bet that the contemporary use of the term “hater” was taken from the song lyric, “Haters gonna hate” from the song “Playas Gon’ Play.” A history of the phrase is here on the Know Your Meme site. The “Haters gonna hate” phrase came to be a call for people to disregard hostile criticism. It supports strength, individualism, and in the early usages, being true to romantic love. Most current usages are similar to the older phrase, “Don’t let the bastards get you down.” It gave rise to some cool artistic applications (do an image search on the term if you are interested).
So far so good. I’ve got no problem with that as an inspirational meme, especially for a downtrodden individual or group. I do have a real problem with extracting the word “hater” and aiming it at one’s opponents in a discussion or argument.
Reviewing the Dictionary Definitions
Here’s the traditional dictionary definition:
A person who hates.
Here’s a transitional one from Dictionary.com:
1. a grudging or spiteful person, esp one who disparages others: “a woman-hater”; “a cop-hater”; “Don’t let the haters get you down”
a. someone who hates a specified person or thing: “a passionate hater of tyranny”
Here’s the one from Urban dictionary.com, which is said to be the earliest version of the “comtemporary” definition:
A person that simply cannot be happy for another person’s success. So rather than be happy they make a point of exposing a flaw in that person.
Hating, the result of being a hater, is not exactly jealousy. The hater doesnt really want to be the person he or she hates, rather the hater wants to knock someone else down a notch.
And finally from Wikipedia:
And the Online Slang Dictionary:
A person who disapproves of something; a person who is jealous; a person who criticizes something.
Here’s Why I Won’t Use the Word Myself
1. Traditional Definition
First, by the traditional definition, I am a hater. I hate racism, sexism, animal abuse, bullying and plenty of other attitudes and behaviors. I’m human so sometimes I hate the people who do those things. I have hated people who have wronged me or ones I love. I don’t think it’s wholesome to dwell in hatred, and hating can make a terrible motivation to action. It easily becomes infected and unwholesome. But I think it can be a natural reaction to a horrifying act. I won’t pretend to be immune to it. And I believe that there are worse things than being honest about hating something or someone. Waaaaay worse things.
2. All the Other Definitions
Second, every single one of the other definitions, when used in argument, are ad hominem attacks, or even plain old name calling. The worst sorts of arguments in civil discourse. They are basically insults that try to discredit one’s opponent in discussion (or behind their back) rather than address their points. And I think they are particularly insidious because they have a Polyanna quality of characterizing oneself as innocent and wounded, while one is actually slinging an insult. It’s an attempt at claiming the moral high ground and simultaneously throwing a cheap shot. And incidentally failing at rational argument.
Calling someone a “hater” is calling someone a name while pretending you’re not. It’s an insult, like “jerk” or “asshole.” I’m not fond of name-calling, but I admit to a preference for someone who calls another person a jerk over calling them a hater.
Some people actually accuse others of being divisive of a community and call them haters. But to me, calling someone a “hater” is the epitome of divisive. It is “otherizing” someone. Calling someone an asshole comes across pretty much as your opinion. There are lots of different “asshole” qualities. Calling someone a “hater” attempts to put them deliberately in an inferior group and dismiss whatever they say.
Like all name calling, it goes circular very fast. “No, YOU are the hater!” “No YOU are the hater!” This gets a discussion nowhere.
Finally, to me it often comes across as juvenile. I admit to some bias here, since the first place I heard the term was by fans of Cesar Millan, who often have an instantaneous defensive reaction of the slightest criticism of Millan’s techniques. They cry, “You are haters; you’re just jealous of his success and all the money he makes!”
That’s a great way to avoid arguing actual issues.
- Shut Down Dogs Part 2
- How Skilled are You at Ignoring? (Extinction Part 2)
- Threshold: It May Not Be What You Think
- OMG Could She Really be Talking about the Continuum AGAIN?